REQUESTING SIGNATURES ·
Resolve document questions before asking someone to sign
Turn a recipient's questions into clear answers, separate corrections from requested changes, and confirm the document to review before continuing.
A recipient replies to a signature request with a question about a date, a missing attachment, or wording they do not understand. The useful next step is to resolve that question. Repeating the request to sign can leave both people talking about different things.
Use a short review routine in your usual email thread or project notes. It helps you identify what is unclear, find the person who can answer, and give the recipient a complete document to consider.
Acknowledge the question before discussing timing
Confirm that you have received the question and describe what you will check. If you need another person's input, give a realistic time for your next update rather than guessing at the answer.
For example: “Thank you for flagging the start date on page 2. I will check it against our latest discussion and send you an update tomorrow.” If the review will affect an earlier target date, say that the timing needs to be revisited. Keep the recipient free to ask questions and decide whether they are ready to sign.
Identify the exact point that needs an answer
Record the document title and version, the page or section, and the recipient's question. Quote only the passage needed to locate the issue. A note such as “Page 2, start date: the document says November 4; our email says November 6” is easier to investigate than “Please fix the dates.”
Separate different kinds of questions so each gets the right response:
- Missing information: the recipient needs a referenced attachment, a complete page, or an explanation of where to find a detail.
- A possible error: a name, date, amount, or other detail may not match the information used to prepare the document.
- A requested change: the recipient wants different wording or a different arrangement from the one currently written.
- A meaning that is unclear: the recipient cannot tell what a passage asks them to accept.
Do not treat a requested change as an agreed correction. Confirm it with the person responsible for the document. If a question needs professional advice, refer it to the appropriate adviser instead of offering an interpretation you cannot support.
Keep one question list and name an answer owner
For a single question, the email thread may be enough. For several, keep a short list with the location, question, person responsible for answering, and status. Use plain statuses such as “Open,” “Answer sent,” and “Confirmed.” An answer being sent does not by itself mean the recipient considers the issue resolved.
Keep the list in your existing working notes. It is a coordination aid, not a replacement for the document. Ask one person to combine responses so the recipient does not receive conflicting answers from several colleagues.
Before replying, compare the proposed answer with the complete document. If the answer changes what the document says, have the responsible person review the wording instead of leaving the change only in a message.
Make any revised copy easy to distinguish
When a revision is needed, give it a clear version or date and check related passages for consistency. Changing a start date in one paragraph may leave a schedule or attachment reference out of step. Open the complete revised file and review it before sharing it.
In your message, identify the earlier version, name the replacement, and summarize the specific changes by page or section. Avoid describing a change as “just a small edit” when the recipient needs to assess it. Ask them to review the whole revised document, including the changed passages.
If a signing request is already in progress, check the signing service's current instructions for handling that request before sending a replacement. Do not assume that sharing a revised file disables an earlier invitation. Confirm which request the recipient should use, and do not ask them to sign an outdated copy while the issue remains open.
Send a concise answer with a clear next step
Use wording like this in your normal communication channel, adapting it to what has actually been confirmed:
Hello [name],
You asked about [question] in [document title, version, page or section]. We have confirmed [answer and who confirmed it, where useful].
[If revised: The revised document is named [filename/version]. It replaces [earlier version]. The changes are [specific locations and changes]. Please review the complete revised document.]
Please let me know whether this answers your question or if anything remains unclear. When the open points are resolved, we can confirm the next signing step and a suitable review date.
Remove any line that does not fit the situation. For a new invitation, use our guide to writing a clear signature request message. Before sending a revised document, work through the document preparation checklist.
Check that the review can move forward
- Each question has an answer or a named person working on it.
- Corrections and requested changes have been confirmed by the responsible person.
- The document and the reply say the same thing.
- The recipient can identify the complete copy they should review.
- Any earlier invitation and the next signing step have been addressed.
- The recipient has a clear way to raise anything still unresolved.
A useful response leaves less to infer: which question was answered, what changed, and what the recipient should review next.